Video games have been around for a long time and for almost
as long as video game programmers were able to program violence into their
games, there has been controversy about whether or not violence in video games
causes violence in real life. Every time
there is a killer that was found to have played video games, there are always
people that rise up to blame the killer’s homicidal behavior on violent video
games. These people call for violent video games to be banned but what these
people do not seem to understand is that just playing a violent video game does
not make someone start killing people. There is usually something wrong with
these people and blaming video games on these actions is ludicrous. I am not saying
that study should not be put into what effect violent video games could have on
a person, but banning violent video games completely because some unhinged
people happened to play video games is going too far. As someone who has played video games for
most of their life, I can honestly say that I do not see how people could
actually think that video games alone could cause someone to kill another
person.
There is an
argument that minors should not be able to play violent video games, and while
I do agree with this sentiment, I do not think that banning these games is the
right way to go about it. It should be
left up to the parents to decide what their children can or cannot play. The problem is that these days parents will
buy their kid a game without even pay attention to the rating of the games. Games are given ratings for a reason and that
reason is to make sure that people know what the game contains and the age type
that the game is recommended for. If
parents choose to ignore the game ratings and get their child a game that is
too mature or violent for them, the parents are to blame for their child
getting the game. The game industry has
no power over what parents buy for their kids, all they can do is put the
rating on the game and hope that the rating is heeded by the buyers. To try to go after the game industry because
kids are getting a hold of violent video games is a waste of time because the
only person that can keep kids away from violent video games are the parents.
The jury is
out on whether or not violent video games actually lead to aggression in
people. There are some studies that show
that video games do lead to increased aggression but in most cases, the
findings by these studies are very conflicting (Freeman, David). Some studies
have even shown that video games could potentially have a calming effect on
children with attentional disorders (Freeman, David). What can be gained from these conflicting
results is that while there could potentially be a correlation between violent
behavior and videogames, there is not really enough information to give a
definite answer on what, if any, effect video games could have on a person.
Video games
are always something that are blamed whenever a killer or shooter suspect is
found to have played video games. People
are always quick to blame a killers’ aggressive and erratic behavior on violent
video games. What people always seem to
overlook is that these people usually have mental and emotional problems that
are much more likely to blame for the killings than the video games. The most recent case of video games being
blamed for violent acts was the recent shooting at Sandy Hook. The suspect, Adam Lanza, was shown to have a
massive obsession with guns and other weapons and he was also found to be
autistic and was bullied in school (Rivera, Ray). Yet after the discovery of his obsession with
video games, people were quick to point the blame at his interest in video
games instead of any of the other very possible causes for his homicidal behavior. The people in the town went as far as to have
a burning for violent video games ( Gabbatt, Adam). I can understand some people’s sense of
despair in the wake of such a terrible tragedy, but to blame video games to the
point where you are holding a burning for video games is just ridiculous.
It almost seems as though some people
are just looking for something to blame for these type of tragedies. It seems that with each new evolution of
entertainment, there are always people that make some sort of controversy about
it. When rock and roll first came out,
people were afraid that it would corrupt the youth and would bring about the
end of decent civilization. Elvis had to
be filmed from the waist up when he appeared on television because he swayed
his hips when he sang, and at the time, that was considered to raunchy to be
shown on television. Video games just
seem to be the newest evolution of the controversial forms of
entertainment. In all honesty, while
there are some very violent things in video games, it is not really anything
that you cannot see in television and movies these days. Some rated R movies show more violence than
anything that I have ever seen in a videogame, and yet I never hear anyone blaming
violent acts on movies. I understand not
liking the interactive aspect of video game violence, but there simply has to
be some sort of understanding that video games cannot be solely blamed whenever
there is a tragedy in which the perpetrator played video games. Whether it is through movies, television, or
even music, people are constantly exposed to violent imagery and ideas and
besides the interactive part of it, there is really no difference between video
games and these other forms of entertainment.
I can almost guarantee that if there is a new form of entertainment that
comes out after video games and it incorporates violence in some way, there
will be controversy over that as well.
I do not really see the debates on
violent video games ending any time soon and I can foresee people who blame
video games for violent acts to be around for a long time. While it may be true that video games can
contain a lot of violence, there has not really been any study that has shown a
cement connection between video games and violent behavior in people. I can attest to the fact that video games can
at times be stressful, but I have never once seen the violence seen in video
games as being something that I should do in real life. Most video game players see the violence in video
games as fiction and they treat it as just that, but there are some people who
are unable to differentiate between the violence in video games and violence in
real life. These people usually have
something wrong with them so that the thought of killing people does not seem
inherently wrong to them. The people who
try to have video games banned do not seem to understand that banning video
games will not really solve anything.
There is still violence in movies and in television, and people who mean
to do violence probably watch television and movies as well. Banning video games is not the answer to
stopping violence and the sooner people realize this, the sooner they can begin
to focus on more important things in our society.
Bibliography
Freeman, David. “Violent Video Games May Curb Bullying in
Vulnerable Children, Study Suggests.” Huffington
Post 28 August 2013, Web, 14 November 2013
Gabbatt, Adam.
“Connecticut Town to burn violent video games as Sandy Hook returns to
school.” The Guardian 3 January 2013,
Web, 14 November 2013
Rivera, Ray, Kleinfield, N.R., Kovaleski, Serge F. “Newtown
Killer’s Obsession, in Chilling Detail”. The
New York Times 28 March 2013, Web, 14 November 2013